I’ve come to two strong, but I feel unavoidable, conclusions about the Claremont Institute, the California-based right-wing think tank that supplies Trumpism with its intellectual cadre: One, that they are attempting the creation of a distinctly American form of fascism that studiously avoids references to European forebears, and two, they have become essentially a seditious conspiracy against the American people.
I don’t use this rhetoric lightly; I realize it can sound a bit extreme, even fevered and crankish, but everything else reads like hedging or euphemism. Claremont has played an instigating and integral part in all of the most authoritarian and menacing elements of the Trump era: from the wild proposals to end birthright citizenship and abrogate the 14th Amendment, to the creation and dissemination of “Stop the Steal Propaganda,” to persistent outreach and legitimation of the extreme-right fringe, and then to providing the spurious legal architecture of the January 6 putsch attempt. But one of the Institute’s most concerning initiatives yet is their “Sheriff’s Fellowship,” a direct effort to bind law enforcement to their ideological program. Founded in 2021, the Sheriff’s Fellowship purpose is described in quite partisan but still mostly benign-sounding language on the Institute’s website as a high-minded course in political theory and history for the local police:
Founded in 2021, the Claremont Institute Sheriffs Fellowship offers training of unparalleled depth and excellence in American political thought and institutions, from the country’s top constitutional experts and political theorists. Fourteen sheriff applicants will be selected for their character, aptitude, accomplishments, zeal, and community reputation to gather for five days to study and discuss the political-philosophical, institutional, and historical arc leading from the American Founding to today’s militant progressivism and multiculturalism, with particular emphasis on the role of law enforcement in maintaining liberty. Discussions will be based on readings from primary sources including John Locke, the Federalist Papers, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, key court decisions, and the writings and speeches of great statesmen.
But in a fundraising document recently surfaced by Sherilynn Ifill, the true intentions of the Fellowship are made clearer:
The program is an unabashed effort to create a network of “uncorrupted” ideologically-reliable police outside the normal channels of the justice system. Of particularly note is the mention of the “electoral disaster of 2020.” Clearly, this organization is envisioned as a preventative measure for the repeat of “a stolen election.”
If you’re at all familiar with the history of the American far right, this rhetorical elevation of the stature of the county sheriff will ring a bell. It’s an old stratagem developed by the Christian Identity preacher William Potter Gale, who founded the “Posse Comitatus” movement in the 1970s. (Christian Identity is a variant of fundamentalist Protestantism that fuses race science with biblical exegesis, and holds Aryans to be the true Israelites of the Bible while the Jews are the seed of Satan.) Posse Comitatus, which means “power of the county” in Latin, held that the county sheriff is the highest legal authority a citizen had to answer to. With its association with Old West vigilanteism rather than jack-booted brownshirts, Posse Comitatus served as a nexus where the most extreme elements of the Nazi right could fuse with a broader culture of survivalist, anti-tax protestors and gun's rights activists. The movement’s literature is full of nonsensical interpretations of Magna Carta and English common law and the contention that the old English office of sheriff still legally exists in America. Posse Comitatus was the precursor of the Militia and Sovereign Citizens movement, and many of its adherents went on to engage in terrorism and vigilanteism, either under its own auspices or in other extreme right groups.
Claremont has adopted this rhetoric to connect itself to the currently-existing Constitutional Sherriff’s Movement, which boasts hundreds of actual county sheriffs as its members. In doing this, they are seeking to accomplish two apparent goals of their organization: the extension of a network into far right subcultures and the development of alternate, extra-legal power structures—and now, even armed ones. I am always a bit unsure exactly how seriously to take Claremont’s schemes and ideas, but combined with the Claremont belief that the country is in a virtual state of civil war, this probably shouldn’t be taken too lightly.
(Correction: I misattributed the original publication of the Claremont Sherriff’s Fellowship fundraising letter. Credit should go to Christian Vanderbrouk of The Bulwark.)
I've been thinking a bit lately about the global rise of what I think of as warlordism--essentially the capture of some functions of the state by local and regional actors who may simulate or perform the identity of being insurgents, revolutionaries, etc. but where it's really just about having control of military, juridical and carceral power in a locality to the extent that the ostensible national authority is substantively absent from some portion of its territory. For at least some nation-states this condition has been part of their entire postcolonial history since the second half of the 20th Century. In others, it's a relatively new thing, and in others still it's just a threat on the horizon.
Basically the way I read this initiative, these guys are thinking about a warlordist program, not so much a fascist seizure of the entire territory of the nation-state. What I think they're looking ahead to is a situation where the next generation of Joe Arpaio-types are being hooked up with the administrative structures of counties and states that are 'deep red' with the plan to simply reject any meaningful attempt to assert federal authority over the territory and to make it physically dangerous for any federal official or representative to tread into the warlord's jurisdiction. Abbott and DeSantis are halfway there already to this strategy--Texas is off the power grid, Abbott is sending his own forces to the border, he's shipping migrants to New York City on his own authority, he's thinking about strategies that allow Texas to control its residents even if they travel to other states, and his administration openly scoffs at federal initiatives and commands regardless of their content. It is creepy as hell to see Claremont's people be as instrumentally conscious that the missing piece in this project is an organized ability to mobilize law enforcement on behalf of warlordism, e.g., that you can't just wait for a Joe Arpaio to appear but you need to recruit and organize the spread of Arpaioism.
I'm a political theorist, so naturally I am wondering who is teaching this "Sheriff's Fellowship" course. Also, more pessimistically: it's really disheartening to witness the amount of money flowing into programs like this (from Thiel maybe?), while it's just so damn difficult to get anything funded on the Left.