Unpopular Front

Unpopular Front

Share this post

Unpopular Front
Unpopular Front
Second Thoughts on Epstein; More on Aristotle and "the Tyrannical Soul"

Second Thoughts on Epstein; More on Aristotle and "the Tyrannical Soul"

Reading, Watching 07.20.25

John Ganz
Jul 20, 2025
∙ Paid
109

Share this post

Unpopular Front
Unpopular Front
Second Thoughts on Epstein; More on Aristotle and "the Tyrannical Soul"
12
9
Share

This is a regular feature for paid subscribers wherein I write a little bit about what I’ve been reading and/or watching.

If you are not yet a paid subscriber but regularly read, enjoy, or share Unpopular Front, please consider signing up. This newsletter is completely reader-supported and represents my primary source of income. At 5 dollars a month, it’s less than most things at Starbucks. And it’s still less than the “recession special” at Gray’s Papaya — $7.50 for two hot dogs and a drink.

You can also buy When the Clock Broke, now in paperback, available wherever books are sold. If you are in the UK, it is also available there.


In honor of Trump’s swollen legs — Philip Guston, San Clemente, 1975, oil on canvas

I have a piece for Politico about Elon Musk and Ross Perot that should be out tomorrow, so stay tuned for that. And, in case you prefer to read it in print, my review of Maurizio Serra’s biography of Curzio Malaparte is in today’s New York Times Book Review.


My friend

Vinson Cunningham
, critic extraordinaire and author of the terrific novel Great Expectations, has started a Substack. This is a very exciting development: For my money, Vinson is the best writer on contemporary arts and culture. Don’t take my word for it — he’s been a Pulitzer Prize finalist two years in a row.

Vinson Cunningham's Quiet Storm
Scenes in the City
Hello and welcome to Vinson Cunningham’s Quiet Storm. If you’re here among the initial subscribers, I owe you a special debt of gratitude. Thank you, thank you, thank you. My very modest goal here is to offer you some tunes to listen to and a small snippet of my weekly reading. Sometimes I’ll write a bit about the music or the writing, sometimes not so …
Read more
3 days ago · 22 likes · 1 comment · Vinson Cunningham

I recorded a video with

Jonathan V. Last
of
The Bulwark
this past week. It was a fun and far-ranging discussion, so please do check it out if you haven’t yet!

JVL + John Ganz

John Ganz and Jonathan V. Last
·
Jul 17
JVL + John Ganz

I spoke live with Jonathan V. Last of the The Bulwark about Epstein, conspiracism, populism, the Confederacy, fascism, and, of course, Trump.

Read full story

I urge you all to read Leland Nelly’s 2020 Mother Jones piece “I Called Everyone in Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Black Book,” which I think is the best thing I’ve read on Epstein. I think it more fully illustrates key parts of the “banality of the Epstein” thesis I tried to develop:

After Epstein’s arrest in 2019, a media narrative coalesced around the question of his strange place in the global elite: Epstein the master salesman, a man who had skillfully conned his way into the world’s most powerful circles, fooling everyone in the process. But after my travels through the book, after hearing more of the petty gossip and childish drama of the people who rule our world, I realized this was obviously incorrect. Built into the premise of Epstein the mastermind scammer is the notion that some kind of legitimate path to a legitimate global aristocracy exists. To call Epstein a grifter is to assume he circumvented some genuine meritocratic world order, where the “real” virtuosos dutifully climb the “real” ranks into the oligarchy, powered by nothing but their native talents.

The truth is that the elite world that Epstein ascended into, the one I tapped into by way of the black book, is populated with hordes of loathsome, boring, untalented people living their bumbling, idiotic lives while just so happening to wield some share of the preposterous global bounty that he and the rest were after. For all the mystery surrounding Epstein’s fortune, its existence is hardly more inscrutable than the wealth of any of his other billionaire peers. He earned it the same way they all did, which is to say precisely not at all.

This wasn’t some masterful hack into the global aristocracy. It’s what everyone does. It’s what the whole thing is. There is no scam here. It’s grifters grifting grifters all the way down.

….

This urge to make Epstein’s power sophisticated and complex serves a similar purpose as the elites’ insistence on Epstein’s extraordinary genius–both are ways of squaring the evident smallness of the man himself with the vastness of the world he built and the seemingly outsized influence he possessed. Both of them betray a collective lack of imagination when it comes to just how ludicrously rewarded dumbasses can be in this country. Epstein didn’t have to be anything special to become a key player in an evil conspiracy. He had to be rich, and he had to be useful to people richer and more powerful than he was. The very real possibility is that Epstein was both a rich dumbass and a key player in an evil conspiracy, because evil conspiracies require nothing more.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 John Ganz
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share