Discussion about this post

User's avatar
@ziggy162845's avatar

This post suggests that all antisemitisms are fascist, although not all fascisms are antisemitic.

I would only disagree with one premise of the post. Antisemitism is not a recent affliction of the Republican Party; it has been mainstream since at least the 1990's. What has changed recently is the frankness of the language. The antisemitism of the 1990's referred to an effete "elite:" not defined by wealth. (Remember the expression: "blue-collar billionaire"?) "Elite" meant "Jew" even back then, with only a slight veneer of deniability.

Ron's avatar
Nov 14Edited

I found your conversation with Klein very interesting, and it showcased some media clips I had missed.

Paul Krugman takes on the Groyperification of Heritage today: https://substack.com/home/post/p-178840959

His take is interesting, because it's a mirror-image of Fuentes's take on "the Jews". In Krugman's telling, Heritage has always represented sectoral elite interests, and its job has always been to offer propaganda that masks those interests with whatever "lie of the day" is popular on the right at any given time. As such, Heritage is attuned to the right-wing Zeitgeist, and employs or funds people who represent it authentically. In other words, Heritage's soul is neither Reaganite nor Groyper, but grift (although Krugman suggests that Heritage is trying to change its sectoral allegiances to be more genuinely in line with Fuentes').

22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?